Gambling in Casinos is Legal So Why is it Illegal on the Internet
Recently, the U.S. government passed a law making it illegal for companies to carry credit cards or other such institutions in the United States, internet payments company involved in online gambling. For my part, I would say I’m not a player of any kind for the times I’ve been to a casino or play so few that they can count on one hand, so that you do not I personal interest against the law continues to benefit me in any way whatsoever online games or any other article I’ve just against a bill that I think is unfair, illogical and hypocritical because it allows activity even when the Casinos practiced in cities like Las Vegas or Atlantic City, but not to talk to the Internet. To my way of thinking this is adopted, the equivalent of a law that makes it illegal to drink alcohol in bars, but not restaurants, where activity remains unchanged, but for some reason, makes the law.
The question of who took the law relating to online gambling in the U.S. is so “moral”, which is obviously arbitrary, and when you should look at things from a purely logical point of view never be used as the basis of the law. Because this kind of thinking, not in the U.S. leadership Volstead Act. This is the action that caused the ban in the United States during the 20s, that, contrary to popular error, it is illegal not to produce or consume alcohol, but to sell or buy . Words can not use this course a lot, and in a big way.
Morality, regardless of what we say is never ever a show, and what morality of an individual or a society are not necessarily regarded as such by another person or company. For example, some consider immoral adultery law in most countries to stop or at least not illegal. As another example, I can say that it is illegal in some countries, the consumption of alcohol for religious and moral, but in others it is not. But morality should distinguish between good and evil. Of course, we never lose sight of how these two interpretation also largely subjective, but is mostly used by most societies, murder and theft are wrong accepted.
Regarding the morality of the game, as we support many other things, such as prostitution, alcohol, sex marriages, smoking and drug use always ethical issues and their impact on society as a whole, but it can be bad for people who are of a certain age (18 in most countries) must be voluntarily risk their money in an attempt to attract more of the same, even if that the Internet? These people, after all, are aware that it is. Possibility that your money is lost, at least for this is a question I do not deny that the following reason. Why should it be less moral than a person or losing money for gambling on the Internet is “Wall Street”? This is a place where even larger sums are won and lost. If we pay a little thought on the matter, is to “invest” money in the stock market is not a game, because you’re never sure what advantage or not, unless you privileged information that is illegal even to have. Of course, I am aware that there are people who say that the money market neither gained nor lost, but merely changes hands and it is not the same case with online games and this is not our argument mind that investment (or play) on the stock market can also be made online.
If you look at the issue from a broader yet clever, not Internet gambling is less damaging to the whole or a bet after investing in the stock market? Depending on how you describe it, always keeping in mind that the game is an activity where money changes hands more by accident then by skill or knowledge. The stock market, of course, more harmful to the fact that they result in a position to have devastating effects on the world economy, while Internet gambling can realistically be connected directly involved. In addition to the loss of Internet games are not even close to those obtained by the “subprime” that brought the world caused a recession, but few are willing to use the term, at least for now.
The reason that the U.S. Congress has seen fit to declare illegal gambling on the Internet “morality” is founded. Personally, I do not see how it is “immoral” if such a word applies to people, he can choose to risk their capital relative to those who do the same thing in the stock market. The stock market is a place where people often invest to do the same thing with his own savings, but others are not necessarily those of the company. Richer wants or sometimes do not even realize what you’re doing with your money, it is not, or should not be to decide on each what he or his passing, at the risk of losing funding or not, in this cases also how, where?
However, this will be the question, see everything that perhaps others do not, is that if people are not allowed to play on the Internet or at least those in the United States, they would not have to do so exclusively on American casinos because they have no choice, had to be legal. It is therefore clear that a law banning Internet gambling for moral reasons, then allegedly American casinos would not lose ground competition from the Internet. This leaves the way open for the American game lost, stay in the United States, rather than leave the country. This is in my opinion the real problem, which is disguised as morality.
Of course, since the casinos make more money because. The law for the U.S. government, because the casinos have a higher income tax comes at a time of crisis like unwanted entry This continues even when the Americans play less in online casinos and also spend less money on Trips to casinos or hotels that have casinos. This creates a situation where Internet gambling has benefited not only made American casinos, but all companies associated with it. Thus, these factors take into account, I believe in myself (if nobody else) argue that this law was passed for casinos in the United States and its partners to assist in the preparation of higher profits, while behind the smoke curtain is morality. Moral reasons is that people lose their money and their communities suffer, as if the same does not occur when the activity in the same casinos of Los Vegas or Atlantic City.
Of course, like drinking ban, which does not stop, but rather increased, the law is based on hypocrisy and not online or stop playing, even for Americans (and not the people of other countries, not to mention) that all you need to do is to travel outside of the United States or simply a foreign bank to a credit card., the problem is not bound by the laws that n ‘have no meaning and no purpose other then the interest of some